Wednesday, July 08, 2009

A Word on Mr. Market

One of your partners, Mr. Market is very obliging indeed. Every day he tells you what he thinks your interest is worth and furthermore offers either to buy you out or to sell you an additional interest on that basis. Sometimes his idea of value appears plausible and justified by business developments and prospects as you know them. Often, on the other hand, Mr. Market lets his enthusiasm or his fears run away with him, and the value he proposes seems to you a little short of silly.

If you are a prudent investor or a sensible businessman, will you let Mr. Market's daily communication determine your view of the value of a $1,000 interest in the enterprise? Only in case you agree with him, or in case you meant to trade with him.

--Benjamin Graham, The Intelligent Investor

Benjamin Graham was, of course, the mentor to the young Warren Buffett. Mr. Buffett's understanding of the whims of Mr. Market has has allowed Mr. Buffett beat Mr. Market at his own game for over 50 years. Alas, we are not Warren Buffett.

There's a current debate as to whether the markets (stock, bond, or real estate, for that matter) are currently over-, under-, or fairly valued. I don't think it matters that much right now, really. Mr. Market is who he is when he is.

As an intelligent investors, we shouldn't not fall prey to the whims Mr. Market. Rather we should learn to avoid his game entirely. We can do this with a long-term perspective, dollar-cost averaging into both hot and cold markets, and a reasonable allocation strategy based on our investment time horizon, risk capacity, and long-term goals.

Friday, July 03, 2009

Happy Birthday Vanguard Wellington

Below is a bit of a press release I received from Joshua R. Grandy of The Vanguard Group regarding the 80th birthday of the Wellington Fund (VWELX). I recommend Wellington as a JustForFunds Top Pick in the Moderate Allocation category. It has posted incredible 7.99% returns over the last 80 years. This is about 2% less than what the U.S.stock market as a whole has posted over that period of time. But Wellington is much less volatile than the U.S. market as a whole because of its 30% or so bond composition.

TIME-TESTED VANGUARD WELLINGTON FUND CELEBRATES 80 YEARS OF BALANCE AND DIVERSIFICATION

July 1, 2009 — Vanguard Wellington™ Fund, one of the industry’s oldest and largest balanced mutual funds, today observes its 80th anniversary.

For more than three-quarters of a century, the fund has been an industry stalwart for a balanced approach to investing, offering investors broad diversification, low costs, and simplicity.

“The Wellington Fund is a compelling case for the power of skilled management, balance, diversification, and a long-term outlook,” said Vanguard CEO Bill McNabb. “In many ways, it represents Vanguard’s enduring investment principles.”

Vanguard Wellington Fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation, reasonable current income, and capital conservation, without undue risk, allocating 60% to 70% of its assets to large- and mid-cap value stocks, and the remainder to high-quality government and corporate bonds....

First known as Industrial and Power Securities Co., Wellington Fund was incorporated as a balanced fund of stocks, bonds, and cash on December 28, 1928, by the late Walter L. Morgan, and began operations on July 1, 1929. The fund was renamed Wellington in 1935, the year in which it reached its $1 million milestone. The fund currently has some $40 billion in total net assets.

Wellington Management Company has been Vanguard Wellington Fund’s advisor for 80 years, demonstrating continuity and consistency that is rare in active fund management. In addition, Edward P. Bousa, senior vice president and partner of Wellington Management Company, is only the third equity manager to take the helm of the fund over the past four decades.

“The prudent and successful management of Wellington Management Company has served the fund extremely well over the years,” Mr. McNabb said. “They’ve more than earned the gratitude of the fund’s investors, and we thank them for 80 years of exceptional service.”

Have a look at Wellington (VWELX) compared with Vanguard's Total Stock Index (VTSMX) and Fidelity Magellan (FMAGX):

Vanguard's Wellington, Total Stock Index and Fidelity Magellan
Fund1 Year Returns10 Year Returns
VWELX-13.05%4.26%
VTSMX-26.78 -1.34%
FMAGX-33.34%-3.34%
Source: Morningstar

And, yes, the fund was founded in 1929--just in time for the crash.

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Stocks in the Long Haul

For those of you re-evaluating your portfolio during this lull in the market, here's a little reminder:

Over the long haul, stocks have significantly outperformed most types of other investments (including bonds) and small caps in particular have outperformed large caps by a significant margin. Have a look at a version of a table I show you on occasion:

Value of $1 From Investments in Large Stocks, Small Stocks, Bonds, Cash Investments, and Inflation, 1925-2005
CategoryPerformance
Small Stocks$5,450
Large Stocks$2,045
Bonds$80
Cash Investments$21
Inflation$12
Source, Secondary: Charles Schwab on Investing, June, 2009, from the Morningstar 2007 Yearbook

These results are in keeping with research from many sources over the years including that done by done by Dimensional Fund Advisors (Fama, French and Sinquefield).

Note that the figures do not indicate that small caps have posted more than twice the average annual returns of large caps. The differnce in long term returns on $1 is the result of our old friend compounding.

Monday, June 29, 2009

When Index Funds Ruled the Earth

The traditional index mutual fund has been called a dinosaur
in its unresponsiveness and slowness. Yes, but dinosaurs were around for a long, long, time. And index funds or their variants (ETF, ETN, etc.) are increasing their share of fund universe. And in most asset categories, a good index fund will beat its category average over time.

Below is a table that I update and wheel out occasionally to demonstrate the point. It compares major asset category averages with a Vanguard index fund in that category.

To make sense of this table, just look first at the major asset category to the far left, then the Vanguard fund beneath it, then the figures. For example, to compare the large value category figures with Vanguard's Value Index (VISVX), first find "Large Value" underneath the "Column" head to the far left. The fund underneath the "Fund" column is Vanguard's Value Index (VISVX). The figures for each track straight across left to right.

A number in bold italics indicates where where a Vanguard fund has first beat its category average. The dates in parentheses indicate the Morningstar hardcopy update from which the numbers are taken for each major asset category.


Category vs. Vanguard Index Fund Results
CategoryFund10-Year
Total Return
10-Year
Tax-Cost Ratio
Expense Ratio10-Year
Tax-Adjusted
Return
15-Year
Total Return
Large Value (12-06-08)2.08%1.32%0.88%1.05%6.55%
VIVAX1.97%1.05%0.20%0.90%6.97%
Large Blend (5-21-09)-1.72%0.83%0.85%-1.80%5.81%
VFINX-2.56%0.41%0.15%-2.96%6.38%
Small Value (2-21-09) 4.47%1.39%1.11%3.20%6.67%
VISVX3.38%1.13%0.22%2.41%-
Mid Blend (6-21-09) 3.36%1.34%0.99%2.11%7.15%
VIMSX4.80%0.74%0.22%4.02%-
REIT (4-06-09)2.87%1.97%0.98%1.66%4.08%
VGSIX3.11%2.04%0.20%1.01%-
Developed Non-U.S. (2-21-09)5-Year
Total Return
-1.42%
5-Year
Tax-Cost Ratio
0.96%
Expense Ratio
1.04%
5-Year
Tax-Adjusted
Return
-0.46%
-
VDMIX5-Year
Total Return
-0.84%
5-Year
Tax-Cost Ratio
1.49%
Expense Ratio
0.22%
5-Year
Tax-Adjusted
Return
-1.49%
-
Emerging (5-21-09)8.02%1.05%1.32%7.37% 4.60%
VEIEX7. 84%0.21%0.32%7.59%-
Intermediate Bond (6-21-09)4.42%2.43%0.60%2.67%5.46%
VBMFX5.62%1.89%0.20%3.62%6.34
Short-Term Bond (2-21-09)3.43%1.57%0.60%1.82%4.01%
VBISX4.84%1.66%0.18%3.10%-
Source: Morningstar Mutual Funds. The dates indicate the "Analysis Section" from which the results were taken. They will be updated as new Analysis Sections are released. Last updated: 6-21-09.

Vanguard index funds posted superior 15-year total returns over their category averages in all of the catgories where we have data for both: large value, large blend and intermediate bond.

Vanguard index funds beat their 10-year total return category averages in four categories: mid-blend, developed markets, intermediate bond, short-term bond.

Vanguard index funds beat their 10-year tax-adjusted return category averages in four categories: mid-blend, emerging markets, intermediate bond and short-term bond.

Only in the small value category does the Vanguard fund fail to beat its category average at any point.


In all cases, expense ratios make a big difference. In some cases taxes make a difference.

Pretty good for dinosaurs.

For an explanation of the logic of the index fund advantage, see this simple and brilliant litle paper by Nobel Laureate William Sharpe, The Arithmetic of Active Management by William Sharpe (Nobel Laureate, Economics, 1990).

Friday, June 26, 2009

Life-Long, Long-Term Investment Strategy

In a nutshell:

  • Use a long-term buy-and-hold aproach appropriate for your current assets, capacity for risk, investment time horizon and goals.
  • Diversify your portfolio into these seven major asset categories:

    short-term debt
    US bonds
    non-US bonds
    US stocks
    non-US stocks
    real estate
    commodities.

  • Use broad coverage funds (mutual or ETF/ETN) instead of individual stocks or bonds.
  • Use high-quality, low-cost, and broad coverage index funds where you can.
  • Use an actively managed fund (or "enhanced" ETFs) where an index fund is not available or where there is clear evidence that actively managed funds will consistently beat good index funds (as in the REIT category).
  • Overweight the non-bond portion of a portfolio a bit toward value stock funds in general and small value stock funds in particular (as per the Fama-French three factor model [8.2.8]).
  • Keep the bond portion of your portfolio relatively high in quality and low in duration and maturity (as per the Fama-French two factor model ["The Dimensions of Bond Returns"]).
  • If you want to speculate or gamble a bit in sectors or indulge in market timing, do it with only that percentage of your portfolio that you could afford to lose without any consequence (factoring in the loss of compounding of returns).

For 12 example portfolios using the seven asset categories above, see "Gibson's Asset Allocation: 12 Model Portfolios."

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Performance of Major Mutual Fund Categories Over the Last 15 Years

Which asset categories have performed the best over the last 15 years? I used Morningstar to find the average fund category returns for some major asset categories over the 15 year period ending at some point this year. So remember, the returns reflect the averages of real funds, not indexes.

For comparison purposes I included Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX). Returns are highest to lowest.


Returns of Major Asset Categories Over the Last 15 Years.
Category or FundReturn
Natural Resources7.91%
Utilities6.36%
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (VTSMX)6.35%
Large Blend5.81%
Technology5.79%
Small Blend5.70%
Precious Metals4.37%
REIT4.08%
Short-Term Bond 4.01%
Foreign Large Blend2.04%
Source: Morningstar, February 21, 2009-June 21, 2009

This gives us some perspective, doesn't it? Can we expect these results to repeat over the next 15 years? Almost certainly not. This is simply another demonstration of what we see again and again from different perspectives--that market prognostication and its brother, market timing, are probably fools errands.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Review of Cohen & Steers Realty Shares (CSRSX)

I ususally recommend Vanguard index funds to cover most important major asset categories in an individual investor's portfolio. But there are better choices than Vanguard's REIT Index (VGSIX) in this important category. They are all actively managed, but their after-fee and after-tax returns have historically outperformed VGSIX.

Cohen & Steers Realty Shares (CSRSX) is one of four actively managed REIT funds that I recommend.

Morningstar says of CSRSX:

Managers Martin Cohen and Bob Steers pursue a large-cap strategy that starts with a macroeconomic review of the economy and regional markets then turns to analysts to fine the stocks that have the best combination of assets of growth potential. Management keeps the NAREIT Index inn mind when making sector bets….

The good news is that this fund’s veteran management team, led by firm founders Martin Cohen and Robert Steers knows its way around REIT balance sheets and should stick to the healthiest companies to ride out the storm. The fund has good exposure to the apartment sector, a favorite defensive have whose constituents have funding from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac…

Overall, we think this fund is one of the better ones in the category, given the experience and solid long-term record of its management team and reasonable expense ratio of 1%. Given the problems in the sector, there is no need to jump into it, but we think investors should start building a position slowly. When the credit markets returns to normal, REITs could snap back.

Below is a comparison of CSRSX and Vangaurd's REIT index fund, VGSIX. Note how CSRSX shows small but superior retrns over different time periods.







Cohen & Steers Realty Shares vs. Vanguard REIT Index
FIGURESCohen & Steers Realty Shares (CSRSX)Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX)
Expense Ratio1.00%0.21%
Manager Tenure18 Years13 Years
1-Year Returns-44.09%-47.72%
5-Year Annualized Returns-0.45%-3.11%
10-Year Annualized Returns6.59%5.24%
10-Year Tax-Cost
Ratio
1.57%1.99%
Size-StyleMid-Value/BlendMid-Value
Morningstar Rating (out of 5 stars)4 Stars3 Stars
Lipper Rating
(out of 25 from 5 categories)
1718
Max-Fund Rating (out of 100)93 98
Source: Morningstar, 6-19-09

For a review of the other three actively managed REIT funds I recommend see:

Third Avenue Real Estate Value (TAREX)

T. Rowe Price Real Estate (TRREX)

CGM Realty (CGMRX)

Friday, June 19, 2009

Review of T. Rowe Price Real Estate (TRREX)

T. Rowe Price Real Estate has been a solid performer for many years, and it is one of a handful of REIT funds that is worth consideration.

Morningstar says this of the fund:

Manager David Lee uses a large-cap, low-turnover strategy. With the Wilshire Real Estate Securities Index as it s benchmark. The fund will own both REITs and real estate operating companies. Ideal candidates for the fund will have proven management teams that are in the process of repositioning or redeveloping their sssets….

The funds management experience and broad profile give it continued appeal for those looking to add exposure to mainstream REITs. Manager David Lee has balanced conviction and diversification since the fund’s late-1977 inception. He looks to invest in domestic real estate companies that look attractive based on a variety of measures. His team employs both net asset value and funds from operations (operating cash flows) analysis to identify larger, high-quality real estate stocks….

He [Lee] also maintains a significant stake in mall operators such as Simon Property group because any rebound in the economy will be driven by the consumer. Those positions have hurt in the short term, but over time we think this fund has the chops to once again come out on top.

Below is a comparison of T. Rowe Price Real Estate with Vanguard’s REIT Index:



T. Rowe Price Real Estate vs. Vanguard REIT Index
FIGUREST. Rowe Price Real Estate (TAREX)Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX)
Expense Ratio0.75%0.21%
Manager Tenure11+ Years13 Years
1-Year Returns-47.35%-47.30%
5-Year Annualized Returns2.38%-2.77%
10-Year Annualized Returns6.21%5.46%
Size-StyleMid-ValueMid-Value
Morningstar Rating (out of 5 stars)3 Stars3 Stars
Lipper Rating
(out of 25 from 5 categories)
1918
Max-Fund Rating (out of 100)9598
Source: Morningstar, 6-18-09

The long-term tax-adjusted returns of this fund make this a fine selection to fill the real estate slot in a portfolio. It has only three worthy actively managed competitors:

Cohen & Steers Realty Shares (CSRSX)
Third Avenue Real Estate Value (TAREX)
CGM Realty (CGMRX).

See the reviews of CGMRX and TAREX.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Review of Third Avenue Real Estate Value (TAREX)

Third Avenue Real Estate (TAREX) is my pick for a REIT, both foreign and domestic. It fact, one great advantage of this fund is that its 50% U.S./50% non-U.S. composition make it a good diversifier within the REIT sector. It will not behave exactly like the U.S real estate sector or the non-U.S. real estate sector.

Morningstar says this of the fund:

Like other Third Avenue offerings, this one seeks companies that trade at a discount to management’s estimate of net asset value. The manager favors REOCs over REITs because the former can reinvest cash flow back into the business for growth. The fund often stashes more than 60% of assets in its top 10 holdings, which means it’s among the most concentrated in the category. [But it has a lower standard deviation than Vanguard’s REIT Index fund.]

This Analyst Pick has been buying the bonds of real estate firms. While there are now real estate income funds that buy bond as a matter of routine, this fund is unique in its ability to make those purchases opportunistically, when manager Michael Winer and his talented team think they’re cheap enough to offer equity-like returns.

This fund will no doubt lag when the U.S. housing sector is hot. For this reason an investor may want to add a good domestic REIT like Vanguard’s REIT Index (VGSIX). The advantage of this strategy is that the low cost Vanguard fund will bring down average portfolio cost down while adding U.S. real estate exposure. For the sake of simplicity, though, TAREX is the one stop shopping center of REITs.

Here’s a comparison of TAREX with Vanguard’s VGSIX:

Third Avenue Real Estate Value vs. Vanguard REIT Index
FIGURESThird Avenue Real Estate Value (TAREX)Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX)
Expense Ratio1.12%0.21%
Manager Tenure10 Years13 Years
1-Year Returns-33.46%-46.75%
5-Year Annualized Returns0.80%-1.90%
10-Year Annualized Returns8.89%5.46%
Size-StyleMid-BlendMid-Value
Morningstar Rating (out of 5 stars)3 Stars3 Stars
Lipper Rating
(out of 25 from 5 categories)
1718
Max-Fund Rating (out of 100)6798
Source: Morningstar, 6-16-09

Morningstar concludes:

Overall, we think few real estate managers match [manager] Winer’s experience and ability navigate the current market, with all its distress. This fund’s emphasis on development won’t necessarily provide for a smooth ride in the immediate future, but it should provide long-term investor with healthy returns.

I agree!

Monday, June 15, 2009

What's Going on With REITs?

REITs will stage a comeback. And when they do it would be wise to have an appropriate amount of your portfolio devoted to this excellent diversifier in the form of a good REIT fund.

Below is an excerpt from an article by Eric Rasmussen describing how and why the REITs are behaving the way they are. Remember that the article is talking about the REITs themselves as opposed to the funds that hold them.

In the real estate investment trust world, the motto right now is ”Build, baby, build”—not skyscrapers. Not malls. Not green bungalows on Park Place.

No, right now REITs have to build capital. And fast….

It wasn’t supposed to happen this time. Putting aside for a moment the overheated housing market, the bull years of the mid-2000s were not so much characterized by the rampant overbuilding of new malls, hotels, office parks and skyscrapers, say portfolio managers. Because supply was in check, some believe REITs should have been in a better position to weather a downturn.

But then came 2008. Not only were REITs slaughtered like everything else, but they dipped even farther and faster than the S&P by some measures. The SPDR Dow Jones Wilshire REIT ETF fell 42% for the year. Those declines quickly wiped out much of the breathtaking 328% returns the sector experienced from Jan. 1, 2000, to the end of 2006. From that peak in February of 2007, the index had lost 60% of its value by the end of 2008.

As it turns out, the cheap debt that has undone other sectors of the economy has stained the hands of REIT owners as well, and the sector is awash in leverage these companies are now struggling to cover at the same time the economy sours and rents plummet.

A case in point is the stunning crash of General Growth Properties, one of the largest mall owners in the country with more than 200 shopping centers. The company declared bankruptcy in April after its stock price dived by a vertiginous 97% in 2008. The reason for its Chapter 11 filing was not that it lacked cash flows, say portfolio managers, but that it had so laden itself with debt it could no longer refinance it all….

Using the lubrication of easy lending terms to pursue growth, REITs are now going to have to spend time bulldozing the bad stuff off their books—at a time when banks have frozen lending and are not as liable to refinance.

Meanwhile, the bad economy has crimped need for retail space, hotel space, and office space, making for scarcer occupants, pruned rental income and diminishing real estate value.

Thus REITs have been whipsawed, finding themselves having to go out and find more loans when the value of their collateral has fallen. The regular method of rebuilding capital—dumping property—is hard to do when everyone’s got buildings on the block.

Investors might think now would be a good time to go in and find good deals—great buildings unfairly valued in the economic malaise… But the outlook for these companies is so uncertain that his group now says it wouldn’t recommend purchasing a REIT stock unless the discount was 50%. Bankruptcies are likely, says the report….

Another attractive REIT feature that should be tantalizing investors is the rising dividend yield. REITs are particularly juicy income investments, since they are required to pay out 90% of taxable income every year as dividends.

But even that has become a phantom feature, less tantalizing now when downward rent pressure and more desperate capital needs have forced many companies to cut or suspend their payouts. The yields may be at historic highs, but poor cash flow makes a lot of those dividends untenable….

News?

Although he concedes that the industry is going to be smarting for a while, that’s mainly because of what’s happening in the broader economy with the financial and liquidity crisis—and it has less to do with the inherent weakness of the asset class. The fundamentals of the companies themselves are fairly good, he says....

Those [REITs] that are going to be the most successful, he says, are the ones taking a multi-pronged approach to refinance their debt maturities—by selling assets, delaying or reducing capital expenditures or raising new equity. He likes it when these companies bring new issues to market….

Bloomer says that as long as capital remains tight and banks aren’t willing to refinance debt that’s coming due, we’re going to see more stress in the space. “As things are right now the pain is definitely not over,” he says. “If lending does return in a short amount of time, things will improve. But the problem is we’re not overly optimistic that that’s going to happen yet.

”Dividend cuts will probably become more common,” he adds, “and they’re not going to return until that capital picture improves and they know they can rely on the banks to roll over their debt on reasonable terms. And it’s very hard to predict but all indications now are that we’re still at least year or two away from that.”

Source: "REIT Place, Wrong Time: The Gutted Real Estate Investment Trust Market Girds Itself for More Pain," by Eric Rasmussen, Financial Advisor, June, 2009